Wilson v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
| Kendrick Wilson |
| Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and Brett Hankison |
| 3:2019cv00739 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Brett Hankison. (Walker, Kristie) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Kendrick Wilson. (Fernandez, Maria) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Walker, Kristie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Brett Hankison and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brett Hankison and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2961889, filed by Kendrick Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
