Roberson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Paula Roberson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2019cv00813
Filed: November 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: Colin H Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation #7 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may re-file if she inadvertently omitted any significant reoccurring monthly expenses. cc: Counsel (ALS)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 12/12/2019; re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Paula Roberson. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Roberson's application to proceed without prepayment of fees (DN #3 ) be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 12/30/2019cc:counsel (JWM)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE ASSIGNMENT - SOCIAL SECURITY. The Clerk assigned this case to the Magistrate Judge for ruling on routine, preanswer motions. The Magistrate Judge has determined that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied and, lacking authority to deny pauper status, has recommitted the matter to the Clerk for assignment to a District Judge. The Clerk has assigned the matter to Judge Claria Horn Boom. Judge Boom now REFERS it to the Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. cc: Counsel (RLK)
November 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proposed Order re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paula Roberson. (Fauver, Shannon)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Reason for Deficiency: proposed order. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 11/15/2019. (SMJ)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Paula Roberson. (SMJ)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. (SMJ)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Paula Roberson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (SMJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: L. Jay Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Roberson
Represented By: Shannon Renee Fauver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?