Rollin v. Office of Commissioner et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Rollin
Defendant: Office of Commissioner, Kentucky State Police, Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet and Office of Commissioner/Dept. of Corrections
Case Number: 3:2020cv00004
Filed: January 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David J Hale
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) by Judge David J. Hale on 1/16/2020, granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), however, Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 under an installment plan. All payments shall be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court. The Clerk of this Court is directed to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. Having addressed the filing fee issue, the Court must now undertake a preliminary review of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (Please see Order for further details.) cc: Plaintiff, Finance, Hardin County Detention Center (KD)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Timothy Rollin, by Timothy Rollin. (SMJ)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Rollin. (SMJ)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (SMJ)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Kentucky State Police, Office of Commissioner, filed by Timothy Rollin. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Summons) (SMJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rollin v. Office of Commissioner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky State Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of Commissioner/Dept. of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Rollin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?