Carr v. Perry et al
| Thomas Jewell Carr |
| Andrew Reinhardt, Mitch Perry, Metro Government and Ashlea Hellmann |
| 3:2020cv00169 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/21/2020 Dismissing Case. cc: Counsel, Defendants, Plaintiff (pro se) (ALS)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/21/2020. The Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action. cc: Counsel (ALS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER (EBOC) signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/17/2020; Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff, Finance, Louisville Metro Corrections (ALS)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Jewell Carr. (DLW) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Thomas Jewell Carr. (DLW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (DLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ashlea Hellmann, Metro Government, Mitch Perry, and Andrew Reinhardt, filed by Thomas Jewell Carr. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (DLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
