Best et al v. James et al
| Matthew Chmielewski, Jay Hicks and Nathan Best |
| Mark T. Kirchdorfer Family Delaware Dynasty Trust, Mark T. Kirchdorfer, Mark T. Kirchdorfer Family GSST Trust, James J. Kirchdorfer, Sr. Irrevocable Family GSST Trust, ISCO Industries, Inc., James J. Kirchdorfer, Jr. Pipe Reality Trust, Stephen C. James, James J. Kirchdorfer, Sr. Delaware Trust, Pipe Reality Delaware Trust and James J. Kirchdorfer, Jr. |
| 3:2020cv00299 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Justin R Walker |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 1/9/2023. Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider (DE 92 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (DE 95 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have 30 days from the date of this order to state why the claims against Defendant James should not be dismissed in favor of arbitration. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 9/22/2022 granting 45 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss insofar as it seeks to compel arbitration. Defendants ICSO Industries, Inc., James Kirchdorfer, and Mark Kirchdorfer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
