Rodriguez v. Thorne et al
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Unknown Driver #2, National Indemnity Company, Scarlett Thorne, Keith Noland, Mazzella Holding Company, Inc. and Unknown Driver #1 |
| 3:2020cv00347 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record; Jefferson Circuit Court; Scarlett Thorne, pro se (MNM) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for National Indemnity Company. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by National Indemnity Company from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-002523 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3103036). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Correspondence to Counsel, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Documents, #3 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand previously filed in state court action by Mazzella Holding Company, Inc. (MNM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand previously filed in state court action by Keith Noland. (MNM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand previously filed in state court action by National Indemnity Company. (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
