Musa v. Culp
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Musa
Defendant: Timothy J. Culp
Case Number: 3:2020cv00364
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: Regina S Edwards
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/16/2020 - All dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED, and this matter is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. cc: Counsel of Record (KD)
July 15, 2020 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Ibrahim Musa. (Cox, John)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 6/18/2020. Telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 7/24/2020 at 1:35 PM before Regina S. Edwards. cc: Counsel (ALS) Modified on 7/8/2020: corrected text to reflect Scheduling Conference before Judge Edwards, not Judge Boom (RLK).
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 6/17/2020. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court REFERS this case to United States Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards for purposes of: 1) resolving all non-dispositive pretrial motions; 2) generally managing discovery, including resolving all discovery disputes and conducting any hearing(s) other than the pretrial conference; 3) generally managing all pretrial scheduling issues, including altering any dates and/or deadlines, except deadlines for dispositive/Daubert motions, and the pretrial conference and the trial deadlines; 4) conducting a mid-discovery telephonic conference; and 5) conducting a settlement conference, if requested by the parties. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (RLK)
June 16, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Timothy J. Culp. (Roma, Thomas)
May 27, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ibrahim Musa. Timothy J. Culp served on 5/26/2020, answer due 6/16/2020. (Cox, John)
May 21, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Timothy J. Culp. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DLW)
May 21, 2020 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (DLW)
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Timothy J. Culp, Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3106435, filed by Ibrahim Musa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stock Purchase Agreement, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Tendered) (DLW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Musa v. Culp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy J. Culp
Represented By: Thomas E. Roma, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ibrahim Musa
Represented By: John D. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?