Ritchey v. C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc.
Thea Ritchey |
C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc. |
3:2020cv00386 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Colin H Lindsay |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 es |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay MOTION to Dismiss filed by Thea Ritchey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A- Declaration of Thea Ritchey, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B- Case Law- Mendoza v. Century Fast Foods, Inc., #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order denying Defendant's Motion) (Larson, Tyler) |
Filing 8 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc.. (Bame, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Stay , MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exh. A - Declaration of C. Smith, #3 Proposed Order) (Bame, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 6/9/2020: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/5/2020 at 10:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. cc: counsel, TB (JM) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc.. (Bame, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 6/5/2020; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Lindsay is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (NWT) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Meade Circuit Court #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [ANSWER FILED] by C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc. from Meade Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00112. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-3113737, filed by C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit B Declaration of C. Smith) (DJT) |
ANSWER to Complaint by C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc.. (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ritchey v. C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: C&M Smith Restaurants, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jennifer L. Bame |
Represented By: | Robert D. Hudson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thea Ritchey | |
Represented By: | Tyler A. Larson |
Represented By: | Michele Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.