Douglas v. Jordan et al
Reese Douglas |
Scott Jordan, Srgt Oliver Carnes, Helen Long and L.L.C.C. Prison |
3:2020cv00427 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 8/5/2020. Plaintiff Reese Douglas filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees with a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). IT IS ORDERED that the application (DN #3 ) is GRANTED. However, the plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee under an installment plan (as set forth). cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Finance; LLCC, Attn: Inmate Accts. #288930, 1612 Dawkins Rd., LaGrange, KY 40031 (CDF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis required. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/16/2020. cc: Reese Douglas, pro se (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Prisoner Trust Account Statement by Reese Douglas, pro se. (JWM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Scott Jordan, Helen Long, Oliver Carnes, and L.L.C.C. Prison, filed by Reese Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.