Mathis v. Mayo et al
| Danel Tawan Mathis, Jr. |
| William L. Mayo and Curt T. Flynn |
| 3:2020cv00431 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Justin R Walker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Signed by Judge Justin R. Walker on 7/22/2020 denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees on the Court-approved form, file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, and complete and return a summons form for each Defendant within 30 days from entry of this Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit form and two summons forms with the instant civil action number affixed to each. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) with IFP and summons forms(SRH)
|
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Justin R. Walker. (DLW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Danel Tawan Mathis, Jr. (DLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Curt T. Flynn and William L. Mayo filed by Danel Tawan Mathis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Letter re Account Statement, #2 Summons) (DLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
