Batista v. TT Marketing, Inc.
| Jorge Manuel Batista |
| TT Marketing, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00491 |
| July 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Regina S Edwards |
| David J Hale |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 9/8/2020 granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff shall file her response to Defendant TT Marketing, Inc.'s Motion #5 to Dismiss on or before 9/21/2020. cc: Counsel(JM)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jorge Manuel Batista. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying MTD, #2 Exhibit EX A TTM 2-21-20 Dunning Letter, #3 Exhibit EX B TTM 3-3-20 Dunning Letter) (Lawson, James) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Jorge Manuel Batista (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lawson, James) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Order re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by TT Marketing, Inc.. (Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant TT Marketing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Articles of Incorporation, #3 Exhibit Correspondence, #4 Exhibit Correspondence, #5 Exhibit Correspondence, #6 Exhibit Correspondence, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit) (Gentry, Boyd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/20/2020: #9 Proposed Order) (KD). |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 7/15/2020; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Edwards is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (NWT)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TT Marketing, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TT Marketing, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0644-3138476., filed by Jorge Manuel Batista. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Batista v. TT Marketing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TT Marketing, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Boyd W. Gentry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jorge Manuel Batista | |
| Represented By: | James H. Lawson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
