Kannapel v. International Business Machines Corporation
| Kenneth Kannapel |
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00500 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against International Business Machines Corporation, filed by Kenneth Kannapel. (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - Beard Lipner Depo, #3 Exhibit B - 2019 IQP Quickview v5 (January 1 2019), #4 Exhibit C - Choplin Martinotti Depo., #5 Exhibit D - Choplin Betthany Depo., #6 Exhibit E - Choplin Maleki Depo., #7 Exhibit F - Choplin Dorsey Depo., #8 Exhibit G - Moorer Email, #9 Exhibit H - Batthany Email, #10 Exhibit I - Stephenson Martinotti 30b6, #11 Exhibit J - Stephenson Blackwell, #12 Exhibit K - Stephenson Clarke depo, #13 Exhibit L - Stephenson Moorer depo, #14 Exhibit M - Swafford Martinotti 30b6, #15 Exhibit N - Swafford depo Briggs, #16 Exhibit O - Swafford Wirtenson Depo, #17 Exhibit P - Swafford Leeke depo) (Whitfield, John) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Whitfield on behalf of Kenneth Kannapel (Whitfield, John) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Earnings Estimator, #2 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's IPL, #3 Proposed Order) (Barnes, Justin) |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 7/29/2020 granting #9 Motion for Kelli N. Church to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel, QC(NWT)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Kelli N. Church to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3149389. by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Weber, Katharine) |
|
Filing 8
AGREED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 7/21/2020, granting #6 - Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before August 21, 2020. (KD)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 7/21/2020 granting #5 Motion for Justin R. Barnes to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel(NWT)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order Extending time for Defendant to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by International Business Machines Corporation. (Weber, Katharine) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Justin R. Barnes to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3143167. by Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Weber, Katharine) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Jefferson Circuit Court (MNM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by International Business Machines Corporation. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by International Business Machines Corporation from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-003503 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3140940). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court File, #2 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
