Frieszell v. Department of Corrections et al
Michael Frieszell |
Department of Corrections, Roederer Correctional Complex Medical Staff and Roederer Correctional Complex |
3:2020cv00509 |
July 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION for Legal Relief of Sentance, and MOTION to Award (1) Million Dollars in Damages and (1) Million in Punitive Damages, by Plaintiff Michael Frieszell. (SMJ) |
|
|
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Frieszell, by Michael Frieszell. (SMJ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Prison Trust Account Statement not provided. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/19/2020. (DLW) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DLW) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Frieszell. (DLW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Corrections, Roederer Correctional Complex, and Roederer Correctional Complex Medical Staff, filed by Michael Frieszell. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (DLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.