Bunch et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Tabitha Corey and Rosell Bunch |
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
3:2020cv00681 |
October 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Charles R Simpson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING & REPORT (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/9/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting Form)cc: Counsel (RLK) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Washington Circuit Court (DLW) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (DLW) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (DLW) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (DLW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company from Washington Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00083. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0644-3198794 ). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Record, #2 Cover Sheet) (DLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.