Nanez v. Bruce
| Casey Nanez |
| James E. Bruce |
| 3:2020cv00812 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Regina S Edwards |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (EBOC) by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 2/1/2021. Telephonic Rule 16 Case-Management Conference set for 3/31/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. To participate in the conference, counsel shall use the following dial in information: 1-888-808-6929, Access Code 2887606. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 2/1/2021; pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is REFERRED to U.S. Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards for resolution of all litigation planning issues, a scheduling conference, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Magistrate Judge Edwards is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. A separate order scheduling the Rule 16 Conference will be issued by the Chambers of United States Magistrate Judge Edwards. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel, CM-RSE. (ARM)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by James E. Bruce. (Herrick, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 1/5/2021 granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Mr. Bruce shall be, and hereby is, granted an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint through and including 1/29/2021. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Defendant James E. Bruce (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Herrick, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to James E. Bruce. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons. (SRH) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (SRH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Casey Nanez, against James E. Bruce. Filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3238763. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Mariner Note, #2 Exhibit B- Collection Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Motion for Default, #4 Exhibit D- Default Judgment, #5 Exhibit E- Wage Garnishment, #6 Cover Sheet, #7 Summons tendered) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nanez v. Bruce | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James E. Bruce | |
| Represented By: | Robert B. Herrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Casey Nanez | |
| Represented By: | James H. Lawson |
| Represented By: | James R. McKenzie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
