Rhodes v. Smith et al
| Brice Jamar Rhodes |
| City of Louisville, Dr. A. Smith, Dwayne Clarke, Amy Hess and Louisville Metro Department of Corrections |
| 3:2020cv00836 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Response to #3 Notice of Deficiency filed by Brice Jamar Rhodes. (JM) |
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 12/19/2020. Within 30 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall either 1) pay the $52 administrative fee or 2) file a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of the $52.00 administrative fee along with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the past six months. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (DLW)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Summons needed for each defendant. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/16/2021. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (ALS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 350, receipt number L33065651) filed by Brice Jamar Rhodes. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ALS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
