Roberts v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
Jason Roberts |
Brett Rhem, Dwayne Clark, Unknown Defendants, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Devan Simpson and Tina Payne |
3:2021cv00039 |
January 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Colin H Lindsay |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 3/17/2021. Telephonic Rule 16 Case-Management Conference set for 5/6/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. Counsel shall connect to the conference by dialing 1-888-808-6929, access code 2773744. cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Plaintiff Jason Roberts (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit second amended complaint, #3 Summons summons louisville) (Astorino, Robert) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jason Roberts. (Astorino, Robert) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 3/8/2021; pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is REFERRED to U.S. Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay for resolution of all litigation planning issues, a scheduling conference, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Magistrate Judge Lindsay is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. A separate order scheduling the Rule 16 Conference will be issued by the Chambers of United States Magistrate Judge Lindsay. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel,CM-CHL. (ARM) |
Filing 9 Defendants ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by Tina Payne, Brett Rhem, Devan Simpson. (Ogburn, J.) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Dwayne Clark, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of motion to dismiss, #2 Proposed Order) (Ogburn, J.) |
Filing 7 Summonses Issued as to Tina Payne and Devan Simpson. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (Attachments: #1 Summons - Simpson) (SMJ) |
Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jason Roberts. (SMJ) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 2/2/2021 granting #4 Motion to Amend. Summons shall issue on any party not previously joined in this action. cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct by right under FRCP 15(a)(1) by Plaintiff Jason Roberts (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Supplement first amended complaint, #3 Summons summons payne, #4 Summons summons simpson) (Astorino, Robert) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Dwayne Clark, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Brett Rhem and Unknown Defendants. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. (SRH) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (SRH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jason Roberts, against Dwayne Clark, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Brett Rhem, and Unknown Defendants. Filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3268736. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons tendered) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.