Kim v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
| Tyra Kim |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency doing business as Fed Loan Servicing Company, Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00132 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service by Tyra Kim. (Funk, Emily) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. (SRH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC and Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. (SRH) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (SRH) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT, filed by Tyra Kim, against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation, and Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency. Filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3295458. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons tendered) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
