Ferguson v. Goff et al
| David Wayne Ferguson |
| Douglas Patrick Vowels and Kenneth Harold Goff, II |
| 3:2021cv00281 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, MOTION for Leave to File by Plaintiff David Wayne Ferguson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit) (DJT)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (EBOC) Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 5/18/2021 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Because Plaintiff is proceeding without the prepayment of fees, or in forma pauperis, the Court must review the complaint. Once the review is complete, an order will be entered informing the parties of what steps, if any, must be taken. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (SRH)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Wayne Ferguson (DJT)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (DJT)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kenneth Harold Goff, II, Douglas Patrick Vowels, filed by David Wayne Ferguson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons) (DJT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
