Gripp v. Fed Gov. et al
David M. Gripp |
Fed Gov. and Fed Emp. |
3:2021cv00298 |
May 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 5/26/21: IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and for failure to meet the pleading standard under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order. This Court further certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). cc: Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 5/26/21; granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: This case will be dismissed by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David M. Gripp (DJT) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Non-Electronic Document by David M. Gripp re #1 Complaint. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fed Emp., Fed Gov., filed by David M. Gripp. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.