Ca'Mel v. Ford Motor Company
| Queen Deborah Ca'Mel |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 3:2021cv00314 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/23/2022 granting #10 Proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees. cc: Counsel (SRH)
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice by Ford Motor Company. (Keal, R.) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ON REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING AND REFERRAL ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/9/2021. Pre-Discovery disclosures due by 9/7/2021. Rule 26(e) Disclosures due by 2/8/2022. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 4/4/2022. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 5/18/2022. Plaintiff's Joinder of Parties/Amendment of Pleadings due by 12/7/2021. Defendant's Joinder of Parties/Amendment of Pleadings due by 3/7/2022. Discovery due by 6/17/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 7/18/2022. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay for full pre-trial/non-dispositive matters. cc: counsel (SRH)
|
| Filing 8 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Ford Motor Company. (Keal, R.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR MEETING & REPORT (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/21/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting Form)cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of E-Filing Exemption for Philip C. Kimball Attorney for Plaintiff. (SRH) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company. (Keal, R.) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Jefferson Circuit Court (MNM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-002416 (filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3344926). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons and Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Annual Report, #4 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ca'Mel v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Queen Deborah Ca'Mel | |
| Represented By: | Philip C. Kimball |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | R. Thad Keal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
