Clervrain v. Grimes
Manetirony Clervrain |
Alison Lundergan Grimes, Andre Matevousian, Mitch McConnell and Angela Solomon |
3:2021cv00400 |
June 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Consideration of Compelling Need or Controversies to Litigate by Invoking the Ants Duty Mitigating Act; filed by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (JM) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain (JM) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Alison Lundergan Grimes, Andre Matevousian, Mitch McConnell, Angela Solomon, filed by Manetirony Clervrain. (JM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/13/2021: #1 Cover Sheet) (JM). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Forms, Summons, Filing Fee or Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/19/2021. (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT "MOTION FOR ["PROMPT NOTICES(s)"] OR ["THEIR EXPERTISE ACT'] ("TEA"), OR OPINION(s) BY THE NATIONAL ISSUES REGULATORY TREATIES ACT ("NIRTA") against Alison Lundergan Grimes, et al., filed by Manetirony Clervrain. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.