Cox v. Rivercrest Homeowners Association Inc. et al
Valencia Marie Cox |
Rivercrest Homeowners Association Inc., Jennifer E. Porter and Bullitt County Metro Government |
3:2021cv00461 |
July 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 8/16/2021 denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff must either: (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full to the Clerk of the District Court or (2) file the Court's approved motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send to Plaintiff a copy of the Court's approved motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with this case number affixed thereto. Plaintiff is WARNED that failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (SRH) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Valencia Marie Cox (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bullitt County Metro Government, Jennifer E. Porter, Rivercrest Homeowners Association Inc., filed by Valencia Marie Cox. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.