Perkins v. Ensite USA, Inc.
Kevin Perkins |
Ensite USA, Inc. |
3:2021cv00581 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Benjamin Beaton |
Regina S Edwards |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 021 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 10/19/2021 granting #6 Motion for Attorney Jospeh A. Fitapelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(JM) |
Filing 9 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 10/19/2021 granting #4 Motion for Attorney Richard J. Burch to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(JM) |
Filing 8 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 10/19/2021 granting #5 Motion for Attorney Frank J. Mazzaferro to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(JM) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Edwards for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Edwards may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Joseph A. Fitapelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3448809. by Plaintiff Kevin Perkins (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Fitapelli, Joseph) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Frank J. Mazzaferro to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3448801. by Plaintiff Kevin Perkins (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Mazzaferro, Frank) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Richard J. Burch to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3440671. by Plaintiff Kevin Perkins (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Burch, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2021: #2 Proposed Order) (JM). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ensite USA, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ensite USA, Inc. Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3431648, filed by Kevin Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employee Handbook, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Consent, #3 Exhibit C - Tolling Agreement, #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perkins v. Ensite USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Perkins | |
Represented By: | Frank J. Mazzaferro |
Represented By: | Joseph A. Fitapelli |
Represented By: | Richard J. Burch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ensite USA, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.