Jones v. Source Solutions Management, LLC et al
| Naticha Jones |
| Source Solutions Management, LLC and Gregory L. Hopkins |
| 3:2021cv00616 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Lanny King |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Naticha Jones (Hormozdi, Shireen) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gregory L. Hopkins and Source Solutions Management, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gregory L. Hopkins and Source Solutions Management, LLC. Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3444483, filed by Naticha Jones. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
