Fowler v. Kentucky Unemployment Commission et al
| Janiece Fowler |
| Kentucky Unemployment Commission and CBS Medical Billing and Consulting, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00677 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand by Defendant Kentucky Unemployment Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Mot to Dismiss/Bifurcate, #2 Proposed Order) (Lynch, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by CBS Medical Billing and Consulting, LLC. (Lamb, Emily) |
| Filing 5 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (SRH) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: counsel of record, Jefferson Circuit Court (SRH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CBS Medical Billing and Consulting, LLC. (SRH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David Domene and Emily C. Lamb on behalf of CBS Medical Billing and Consulting, LLC. (SRH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CBS Medical Billing and Consulting, LLC from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-05924. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3468780). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - state court record, #2 Cover Sheet) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
