Adamson v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Adamson
Defendant: Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Lupin Limited
Case Number: 3:2021cv00687
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Lupin Limited, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (VanVactor, Zachary)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Joshua Adamson. (Spalding, John)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Lupin Limited, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (VanVactor, Zachary)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AGREED ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 11/29/2021 granting #5 Proposed Agreed Order. Defendants Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lupin Limited shall have up to and including 12/3/2021 to file their responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint. cc: Counsel(JWM)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proposed Agreed Order Extending Defendants' Responsive Pleading Deadline Through 12/3/21 by Lupin Limited, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (VanVactor, Zachary)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Oldham Circuit Court and Counsel. re #1 Notice of Removal. (CDF)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDF)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Lupin Inc., Corporate Parent Lupin Limited, for Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc, by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Lupin Limited. (CDF)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Oldham Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00491, filed by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Lupin Limited. (Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYWDC-3471374) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Notice of Removal, #3 Cover Sheet) (CDF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adamson v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Adamson
Represented By: Erin E. Smallwood
Represented By: John K. Spalding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Represented By: Zachary M. VanVactor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lupin Limited
Represented By: Zachary M. VanVactor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?