Robinson v. Metz Culinary Management, Inc.
| William Robinson |
| Metz Culinary Management, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00762 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Regina S Edwards |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 er |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William Robinson. (Scharfenberger, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 1/26/2022 granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading on or before 1/24/2022. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF NEW AUTHORITY REGARDING MOTION TO REMAND by Metz Culinary Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 New Decision Denying Motion to Remand) (Inman, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Metz Culinary Management, Inc.. (Inman, J.)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Metz Culinary Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Inman, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Edwards for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Edwards may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand filed by Metz Culinary Management, Inc.. (Wimsatt, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendant Metz Culinary Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension) (Wimsatt, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff William Robinson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit stipulation, #2 Proposed Order) (Scharfenberger, Kurt)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE to Bullitt Circuit Court and Counsel, re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DeW)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Metz Culinary Management, Inc. from Bullitt Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00938. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3494496.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Cover Sheet) (DeW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Metz Culinary Management, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Kurt A. Scharfenberger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metz Culinary Management, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | J. Andrew Inman |
| Represented By: | Jessica N. Wimsatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
