Swain v. Montgomery et al
Demarcus Swain |
Officer Mr. Montgomery, Officer Mr. Bobby, Officer Mr. Ewalt, Officer Mr. Chilko and Sgt. Mr. Webb |
3:2022cv00006 |
January 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 1/31/2022, GRANTING #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Filing fee to be paid according to the installment plan as set forth. Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open an account for the payment of the filing fee. Court to undertake a preliminary review of Plaintiff's Complaint. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Finance; LMDC(RLK) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (SRH) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Demarcus Swain. (SRH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Demarcus Swain. (SRH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Demarcus Swain against Officer Mr. Bobby, Officer Mr. Chilko, Officer Mr. Ewalt, Officer Mr. Montgomery, and Sgt. Mr. Webb. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Summons tendered) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.