Kentucky Container Service Inc. v. Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Plaintiff: Kentucky Container Service, Inc.
Defendant: Kuehne Nagel Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv00119
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/11/22: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (R. #12 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint (R. #1 -1) is DISMISSED, and this action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER. cc:counsel (DJT)
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/11/22; granting #12 Motion to Dismiss: The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Kuehne + Nagel Inc. [R. #12 ] is GRANTED. Plaintiff Kentucky Container Service Inc.'s Complaint is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's ACTIVE DOCKET. cc: Counsel(DJT)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SECOND SHOW CAUSE ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/7/22: IT IS HEREBYORDERED that NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why it has not complied with the Court's Orders. cc: Counsel (DJT)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 SHOW CAUSE ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/29/22: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why it has not complied with the Court's Order. cc:counsel (DJT)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable #11 sent to Andrew R. Spector. (DJT)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Kuehne + Nagel International AG for. by Kuehne Nagel Inc.. (Fagel, Barry)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ANDREW SPECTOR signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/16/22; granting #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(DJT)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE Completing CM/ECF Training by Kuehne Nagel Inc. re #16 Order, #15 MOTION for Andrew Spector to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3538713. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Training) (Fagel, Barry)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DIRECTING CORPORATE PARTIES TO FILE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/14/22 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall FILE their respective Corporate Disclosure Statements that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. cc: Counsel (DJT)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ORDERING ATTORNEY ANDREW ROBERT SPECTOR TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/11/22. cc: Counsel (DJT)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MOTION for Andrew Spector to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3538713. by Defendant Kuehne Nagel Inc. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Certificate of Good Standing) (Fagel, Barry)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kuehne Nagel Inc.. (DJT)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kentucky Container Service, Inc.. (DJT)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Kuehne Nagel Inc. (DJT)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO DOCKET MOTION TO DISMISS FILED IN JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 3/1/22: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to re-docket Defendant Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.'s, Motion to Dismiss [R. #9 ], Plaintiff Kentucky Container Service, Inc.'s, Response to the Motion to Dismiss [R. #1 2] and Defendant Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.'s, Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss [R. #10 ], all as of the date of entry of this Order. cc: Counsel (DJT)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM re #9 Notice (Other) by Kuehne Nagel Inc.. (Fagel, Barry)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to Dismiss by Kuehne Nagel Inc. (Fagel, Barry)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Andrew R. Spector re #6 Case Transferred In - District Transfer.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 3/11/2022. (KJA)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to District Judge Claria Horn Boom. (KJA)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Kentucky Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-00024. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (KJA)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: That said Motion #4 is well taken and is granted. This matter is transferred to the U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/25/2022.(ECO)cc: COR [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer to Western District of KY by Kentucky Container Service Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(TJZ) [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to presiding Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery and pretrial pr oceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, hold hearings as required, and rule on nondispositive motions. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred by the Clerk of court to the undersigned. Subject to other provisions of law, the final pretrial conference and trial will be before the un Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 USC 636(c).. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/18/2010.(ECO)cc: COR [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-007309. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5200008), filed by Kuehne + Nagel Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B-Response)(ECO) [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (ECO) [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of William O. Bertelsman for review: re #4 MOTION to Transfer by Kentucky Container Service Inc. (TJZ) [Transferred from kyed on 2/25/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kentucky Container Service Inc. v. Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kentucky Container Service, Inc.
Represented By: Richard J. Head
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kuehne Nagel Inc.
Represented By: Andrew R. Spector
Represented By: Barry F. Fagel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?