Yates v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
Bryan Yates |
Becton, Dickinson and Company |
3:2022cv00172 |
March 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 4/15/2022 granting #8 Motion to Withdraw re #6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (by Attorney Matthew S. Goeing) and for a refund of the fee associated with that motion. cc: Counsel, Finance, QC (JM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of filing of Proposed Order by Bryan Yates re #8 MOTION to Withdraw Prior Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice and for Refund of Fee (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Goeing, Matthew) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Prior Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice and for Refund of Fee by Plaintiff Bryan Yates (Goeing, Matthew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2022: #1 Proposed Order) (DLW). |
Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Southern District of Ohio as case 2:22-cv-01942, filed 04/12/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER No. 82 from Southern Ohio re MDL 2846. (KJA) |
Case transferred to District of SD/OH. Case electronically transferred. (KJA) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3559640. by Plaintiff Bryan Yates (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order on Admit Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Goeing, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Matthew Goeing re #1 Notice of Removal,.Reason for Deficiency: admission to this Court/motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/11/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Jefferson Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties, re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (DeW) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Becton, Dickinson and Company by Becton, Dickinson and Company. (DeW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-001290, filed by Becton, Dickinson and Company. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3549403.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yates v. Becton, Dickinson and Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bryan Yates | |
Represented By: | Matthew Goeing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Becton, Dickinson and Company | |
Represented By: | Carol D. Browning |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.