Wolfe v. LMDC et al
Cody A. Wolfe |
LMDC, Dewayne Clark and D. Bullock |
3:2022cv00183 |
April 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Letter from Cody A. Wolfe requesting status of case. (JWM) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to D. Bullock. Service packet sent to USM-LV for delivery as directed. (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (SMJ) |
Filing 8 SERVICE AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/26/2022. The Clerk of Court shall issue a summons, and the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint (DN #1 ), the separate Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, this Service and Scheduling Order, and summons on Defendant Bullock in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of these documents shall also be mailed to the Jefferson County Attorney. All Pretrial Discovery due by 9/22/2022. Pre-trial Memorandum (Plaintiff) due by 10/24/2022. Pre-trial Memorandum (Defendant) due by 11/23/2022. All Dispositive Motions due by 11/23/2022. Plaintiff is WARNED that his failure to notify the Clerk of Court of any address change or failure to comply with this or any subsequent order of the Court MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Prisoner Handbook. cc: Plaintiff-pro se (w/ handbook), Defendant Bullock (as directed), Jefferson County Atty. (as directed) (SMJ) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/26/2022. Plaintiff's claim against LMDC, his claims against Defendant Clark, his official-capacity claim against Defendant Bullock, and his discrimination claim against Defendant Bullock in her individual capacity are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate LMDC and Dewayne Clark as parties to this action. The Court will enter a Service and Scheduling Order to govern the development of this action. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendants, Jefferson County Atty. (SMJ) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/22/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. LMDC shall collect the filing fee from Plaintiff's prison trust account. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Finance, LMDC - Inmate Accounts (SRH) |
Filing 5 Response to #4 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Cody A. Wolfe. Prison Trust Account Statement Not Tendered. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered, #2 Signature Page, #3 Envelope) (JWM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint, #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Reason for Deficiency: Incomplete Summons forms and failure to file Prisoner Trust Account Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 5/6/2022. cc: Plaintiff, pro-se (DeW) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cody A. Wolfe. (DeW) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DeW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LMDC, Dewayne Clark, D. Bullock, filed by Cody A. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Summons TENDERED) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.