Stewart v. INOAC Group North America, LLC

Plaintiff: Tyrone Stewart doing business as Nanya Akufu El
Defendant: INOAC Group North America, LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00220
Filed: April 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion re #15 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by INOAC Group North America, LLC. (CLERK'S ENTRY ONLY for report purposes -- See #16 for PDF.) (RLK)
June 16, 2022 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by INOAC Group North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Lawsuit against Undersigned Counsel) (Hardin, Chadler) Modified on 6/17/2022: removed link from #15 (RLK).
May 26, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment, by Plaintiff Tyrone Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B1, #4 Exhibit B2, #5 Exhibit B3, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 attachment) (SMJ)
May 9, 2022 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by INOAC Group North America, LLC. (Corporate Parent INOAC USA, Inc.) (Hardin, Chadler) Modified on 5/9/2022 to add corporate parent (DLW).
May 9, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant INOAC Group North America, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hardin, Chadler)
May 5, 2022 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tyrone Stewart. INOAC Group North America, LLC served on 4/22/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (DJT)
May 2, 2022 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tyrone Stewart. (DJT)
April 25, 2022 Filing 10 ORDER DIRECTING CORPORATE PARTY TO FILE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 4/25/22: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Tyrone Stewart shall FILE a Corporate Disclosure Statement as to Nanya Akufu El that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Counsel (DJT)
April 22, 2022 Filing 9 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to District Judge Claria Horn Boom. (KJA)
April 22, 2022 Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Kentucky Eastern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00022. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (KJA)
April 22, 2022 Filing 7 ORDER: this action is TRANSFERRED to the Louisville Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/22/22.(CBD)cc: CORand Tyrone Stewart by US Mail [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 22, 2022 Remark: mailed plaintiff NEF/case assignment of new case information. (KJA)
April 21, 2022 Filing 6 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/6/2016.(JJ)cc: COR and Tyrone Stewart by US Mail [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 21, 2022 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 21, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding re #1 Complaint cc: form e-mailed to Register. (JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 21, 2022 Conflict Check run. (JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 21, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint (JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 20, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to INOAC Group North America, LLC; Summons issued and returned to pro se via pick-up from Office of Clerk (JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]
April 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 3002789), filed by Tyrone Stewart, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Trade Name, #2 Summons INOAC Group North America, LLC, #3 Receipt )(JJ) [Transferred from kyed on 4/22/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. INOAC Group North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Stewart doing business as Nanya Akufu El
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INOAC Group North America, LLC
Represented By: Chadler M. Hardin
Represented By: Christopher E. Schaefer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?