Culver v. Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District
| William Culver |
| Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District |
| 3:2022cv00247 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 6/1/2022 granting #7 Motion for Diana Kozlova to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel (DeW)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Lindsay for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Lindsay may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by William Culver re #7 MOTION for Diana Kozlova to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3591460. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Diana Kozlova to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3591460. by Plaintiff William Culver (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dutkanych, Andrew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/31/2022: #2 Exhibit A- Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B- Certificate of Good Standing) (DeW). |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by William Culver. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Culver. Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District served on 5/9/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of William Culver (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District, filed by William Culver. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3576908.) (Attachments: #1 Summons TENDERED, #2 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Culver v. Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Culver | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Dutkanych, III |
| Represented By: | Diana Kozlova |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Louisville Metro Metropolitan Sewer District | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
