Cohron v. Lewis et al
| David Thomas Cohron |
| Michael Lewis and Kentucky Department of Corrections |
| 3:2022cv00260 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Because the Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal without prejudice (DN #7 ), this action stands dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and the Court strikes it from the active docket. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: counsel (JM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Thomas Cohron (JM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by David Thomas Cohron (JM) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. cc: Plaintiff, pro-se (DeW) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Thomas Cohron. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Thomas Cohron. (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kentucky Department of Corrections, Michael Lewis, filed by David Thomas Cohron. (Attachments: #1 Summons TENDERED) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
