Gist v. Trinity Services Group et al
Plaintiff: Richard Gist
Defendant: Trinity Services Group, Martin Baker and Dawayne Clark
Case Number: 3:2022cv00270
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Richard Gist (DJT)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 6/16/22; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Finance, LMDC (DJT)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Response to #6 Notice of Deficiency, #5 Notice on Summons, filed by Richard Gist. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - tendered summons, #2 envelope) (SMJ)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard Gist. (SMJ)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Missing signature on Complaint. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 6/21/2022. (CDL)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS issued regarding incomplete summons form re: DN #1 Complaint. (CDL)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Reason for Deficiency: missing Prisoner Trust Account Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 6/21/2022. (CDL)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard Gist. (CDL)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (CDL)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Martin Baker, Dawayne Clark, and Trinity Services Group filed by Richard Gist (Filing Fee not paid). (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered). (CDL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/19/2022: #2 Exhibit 1) (CDL).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gist v. Trinity Services Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Gist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trinity Services Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dawayne Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?