Castillo v. Lyft, Inc. et al
| Edel Toste Castillo |
| Lyft, Inc. and Hireright, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00288 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 11/8/2022. This action and all claims asserted therein is dismissed with prejudice as to both HireRight and Lyft, with each party bearing that party's own attorneys' fees and costs. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Order Of Dismissal by Hireright, LLC, Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 9/2/2022. In order to allow the parties time to finalize a tentative resolution, the parties have agreed to a sixty (60) day extension of time by which Defendants will move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The new deadline shall be 11/7/2022. cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME by Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
|
Filing 11
AGREED ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE INITIAL RESPONSIVE PLEADING OF DEFENDANTS LYFT, INC. AND HIRERIGHT, LLC by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 8/8/2022 granting #10 Proposed Agreed Order. Answer or other responsive pleading due 9/7/2022. cc: Counsel; Robert Charles(JWM) Modified to edit dist on 8/8/2022 (JWM).
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Agreed Order OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE INITIAL RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Hireright, LLC, Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
|
Filing 9
AGREED ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/13/2022 granting #8 Proposed Agreed Order. The parties have agreed to a thirty (30) day extension of time by which Defendants will move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The new deadline shall be 8/8/2022. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE INITIAL RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Hireright, LLC, Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lyft, Inc. (Healy, Patrick) Modified on 6/10/2022, text removed (SMJ). |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Corporate Risk Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent HireRight Holdings Corporation for Hireright, LLC. by Hireright, LLC. (Bailen, Neal) |
|
Filing 5
AGREED ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 6/6/2022 granting #4 Proposed Agreed Order. The parties hereby agree to a thirty (30) day extension of time for Defendants Lyft, Inc. and HireRight, LLC to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The new deadline shall be 7/7/2022. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of time for Initial Responsive Pleading of Defendants by Hireright, LLC, Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL to Jefferson Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re DN #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (No Answer Filed) by Lyft, Inc. and Hireright, LLC from Jefferson Circuit Court, Case number 22-CI-02245. (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3592409), filed by Lyft, Inc. and Hireright, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Pleadings) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
