Gaskins v. Swope Ventures, Inc.
| Daniel Gaskins |
| Swope Ventures, Inc. doing business as Swope Mitsubishi |
| 3:2022cv00306 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION to Strike #8 Reply to Response to Motion and Alternative Motion for Discovery by Plaintiff Daniel Gaskins (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 8
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Swope Ventures, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Declaration of Jennifer Kessler) (Stamelos, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Seal Document by Plaintiff Daniel Gaskins (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Daniel Gaskins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Affidavit of Daniel Gaskins, #2 Exhibit 2 -- KOSHA Complaint Addendum, #3 Exhibit 3 -- Dept. of Labor Feb. 2, 2022 Letter, #4 Exhibit 4 -- KOSHA Affidavit of Gaskins, #5 Proposed Order) (Smith, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Swope Ventures, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A: to Memo in Support - Dispute Resolution Agreement, #3 Exhibit B: to Memo in Support - Signed Agreement to Dispute Resolution, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Stamelos, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE to Hardin Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re: #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 3
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Creative Automotive Solutions, Inc. for Swope Ventures, Inc. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Swope Ventures, Inc. from Hardin Circuit Court (No Answer Filed), case number 22-CI-00591(Filing fee $ 402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3597900), filed by Swope Ventures, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons and Complaint in State Court, #2 Exhibit B: Return of Service in State Court, #3 Exhibit C: Notice to Circuit Court of Filing Removal, #4 Cover Sheet) (CDL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gaskins v. Swope Ventures, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Gaskins | |
| Represented By: | Adam M. Johnson |
| Represented By: | Robyn R. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Swope Ventures, Inc. doing business as Swope Mitsubishi | |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Stamelos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
