Sanders v. The City of Louisville et al
Plaintiff: Jermaine Sanders
Defendant: The City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Corrections and Dwayne Clark
Case Number: 3:2022cv00323
Filed: June 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Jermaine Sanders, pro se (JWM)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 7/14/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 under an installment plan pursuant to 28:1915(b)(1). cc: Plaintiff, pro se; TCDC-Inmate Accts; KYWD-Finance(JWM)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Response to #6 Notice of Deficiency filed by Jermaine Sanders. (JWM)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Tendered Summonses by Jermaine Sanders re #5 Notice (Other) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JWM)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Missing signature on Complaint. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/21/2022. (CDL)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re DN #1 -1 Complaint mailed to Plaintiff. (CDL)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re: DN #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jermaine Sanders. (CDL)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jermaine Sanders. (CDL)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDL)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dwayne Clark, Louisville Metro Corrections, and The City of Louisville, filed by Jermaine Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (CDL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanders v. The City of Louisville et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jermaine Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Louisville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisville Metro Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dwayne Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?