Guthikonda et al v. Jaddou
Plaintiff: Bhargavaram Guthikonda, Tarun Puri, Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya, Isha Mandrekar, Karan Khatwani, Manik Kalra and Nishant Gehani
Defendant: Director Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 3:2022cv00375
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 055
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2022 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ur M. Jaddou served on 8/5/2022; US Attorney Served 8/12/2022; Attorney General served 8/8/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (See DN #8 to view PDF) (JWM)
August 15, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Manik Kalra, Tarun Puri, Isha Mandrekar, Karan Khatwani, Nishant Gehani, Bhargavaram Guthikonda, Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya as to:Ur M. Jaddou (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Proof of Service) (Galati, Matthew)
August 2, 2022 Filing 7 Summonses Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM)
August 1, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE Tendering Summons with the Court by Nishant Gehani, Bhargavaram Guthikonda, Manik Kalra, Karan Khatwani, Isha Mandrekar, Tarun Puri, Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Summons Jaddou, #2 Summons USAG, #3 Summons USAO KYWD) (Galati, Matthew)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/25/2022 granting #2 Motion for Matthew T. Galati to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel; Matthew T. Galati(JWM)
July 22, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Complaint. Sent by regular mail to Plaintiff's counsel along with summons forms. (MNM)
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (MNM)
July 21, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Matthew T. Galati to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filing fee paid $125, receipt number 300000192, by Plaintiffs Nishant Gehani, Bhargavaram Guthikonda, Manik Kalra, Karan Khatwani, Isha Mandrekar, Tarun Puri, and Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (MNM)
July 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, filing fee paid $402, receipt number 300000191, filed by Manik Kalra, Tarun Puri, Isha Mandrekar, Karan Khatwani, Nishant Gehani, Bhargavaram Guthikonda, and Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Cover Sheet) (MNM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guthikonda et al v. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bhargavaram Guthikonda
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tarun Puri
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bipinkumar Naranbhai Sutariya
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isha Mandrekar
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karan Khatwani
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manik Kalra
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nishant Gehani
Represented By: Matthew T. Galati
Represented By: Matthew Tony Galati
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?