Raymer et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
Ann Raymer and Terry Raymer |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy L.L.C. and CVS Health Solutions LLC |
3:2022cv00399 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING CIVIL COVER SHEET by CVS Health Solutions LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy L.L.C. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Ott, Robert) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Jefferson Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re: DN #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/3/2022 to correct spelling error) (CDL). |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for CVS Health Solutions LLC, and Kentucky CVS Pharmacy L.L.C. (CDL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (No Answer Filed) by Kentucky CVS Pharmacy L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and CVS Health Solutions LLC from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-003455. (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3629118), filed by Kentucky CVS Pharmacy L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and CVS Health Solutions LLC.Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court record) (CDL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2022: #2 Cover Sheet) (SMJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.