O'Bannon v. Louisville Metro Government et al
Antonio L. O'Bannon |
Louisville Metro Government, A. Bland and K. Owen |
3:2022cv00404 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Letter from Antonio L. O'Bannon. (JWM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Tendered Summonses by Antonio L. O'Bannon re #5 Notice on Summons (JWM) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 8/12/2022 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 under an installment plan pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) cc: Plaintiff, pro se; LMDC Attn: Inmate Accts; KYWD-Finance(JWM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re: DN #1 Complaint (Missing Summons). (CDL) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re DN #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio L. O'Bannon. (CDL) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antonio L. O'Bannon. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A. Bland, Louisville Metro Government, and K. Owen (Filing fee not paid), filed by Antonio L. O'Bannon. (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.