Structures USA, LLC v. Unifirst Corporation
| Structures USA, LLC |
| Unifirst Corporation |
| 3:2022cv00462 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 10/21/2022 granting #14 Motion for David M. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 10/21/2022 granting #15 Motion for Hayley E. Kick to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Unifirst Corporation. (Attachments: #1 cover letter) (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Stay Proceedings, by Defendant Unifirst Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit - Demand for Arbitration, #3 cover letter) (SMJ)
|
|
Remark re #16 / #17 : received by Clerk's Office on 10/21/22 via FedEx. (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Hayley E. Kick to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filing fee $125 - receipt #300001195, by Defendant Unifirst Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Cert. of Good Standing, #3 cover letter) (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for David M. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filing fee $125 - receipt #300001195, by Defendant Unifirst Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Cert. of Good Standing, #3 cover letter) (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Ruling on Motion to Stay Arbitration re #3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief by Plaintiff Structures USA, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A_Correspondence of Counsel, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B_Annual Report for UniFirst, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C_Affidavit of Christina Humphreys, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Humphreys' Affidavit_Green Card, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Submission and Ruling) (O'Bryan, Ambrose)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE Proposed Order entering default by Structures USA, LLC re #1 Complaint, #10 Summons Returned Executed, #11 MOTION for Entry of Default (O'Bryan, Ambrose)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Entry of Default by Plaintiff Structures USA, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A_Correspondence of Counsel, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B_Annual Report for UniFirst, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C_Affidavit of Christina Humphreys, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Humphreys' Affidavit_Green Card) (O'Bryan, Ambrose) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2022: #5 Proposed Order) (SMJ).
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re 9 Notice (Other). Error: Incorrect filing event used. Correction: Clerk to redocket as 'summons returned executed'. (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Structures USA, LLC. Unifirst Corporation served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 9
ERROR: Incorrect filing event selected. (O'Bryan, Ambrose) Modified on 9/22/2022 (SMJ).
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Unifirst Corporation. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying corporate parents Structures US, LLC and Nova Structures, Inc. by Structures USA, LLC. (O'Bryan, Ambrose) Modified on 9/6/2022 - parties added (SMJ).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE by Structures USA, LLC re #1 Complaint, (O'Bryan, Ambrose)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Missing Corporate Disclosure Statement and Incomplete Tendered Summons. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 9/9/2022. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Ambrose K. O'Bryan on behalf of Structures USA, LLC. (CDL)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Stay Arbitration by Plaintiff Structures USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A_2017 Contract, #3 Exhibit B_Smook Declaration, #4 Exhibit C_Final Buyout, #5 Proposed Order) (CDL)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Unifirst Corporation (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. BKYWDC-3650985), filed by Structures USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A_2017 Contract, #2 Exhibit B_Disputed Contract, #3 Exhibit C_07-23-2020 Email, #4 Exhibit D_10-6-2020 Email, #5 Exhibit E_01-5-2021 Email, #6 Exhibit F_7-29-2021 Email, #7 Exhibit G_Arbitration Notice, #8 Cover Sheet, #9 Summons Tendered) (CDL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Structures USA, LLC v. Unifirst Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Structures USA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ambrose K. O'Bryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unifirst Corporation | |
| Represented By: | David Scott |
| Represented By: | Hayley Elizabeth Kick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
