Sipes v. The Andersons, Inc.
Fred Sipes |
The Andersons, Inc. |
3:2022cv00473 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by The Andersons, Inc. (*NOTE: This Response was incorporated within DN #17 and has been redocketed by the Clerk for reporting purposes. Please see DN #17 for viewing.) (DLW) |
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case filed by The Andersons, Inc. (White, Jordan) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of withdrawal of counsel by The Andersons, Inc. (White, Jordan) |
Filing 15 TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 10/7/2022, GRANTING #14 Motion for Jacob D. Byland to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the Defendant. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel (via mail to Byland and Bihrle w/ECF Mandatory Notice)(RLK) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Jacob D. Bylund to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $125, receipt number AKYWDC-3670777) by Defendant The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Jacob D. Bylund, #2 Proposed Order) (White, Jordan) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case filed by Fred Sipes. (McCain, Michael) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Arbitration by Plaintiff Fred Sipes (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McCain, Michael) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Machen Picard Bihrle re Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/11/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Jacob D. Bylund re Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/11/2022. (KJA) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 9/15/2022. Pursuant to 28 USC 455, the Court concludes that recusal in this case is required. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is reassigned to the docket of Judge David J. Hale for all further proceedings and disposition, pursuant to General Order 2022-06. Counsel are instructed to change the civil action number to reflect the initials (DJH) in place and instead of the initials (GNS) on all further pleadings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; Case Manager Judge Hale(TJD) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case by Defendant The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Boyd Brooks Complaint, #2 Exhibit March 2020 Trade Rules, #3 Exhibit Second Decl. of Cliff Arfman, #4 Exhibit April 14, 2022 NGFA Letter, #5 Exhibit July 26, 2022 NGFA Letter, #6 Proposed Order) (White, Jordan) |
Filing 7 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DJT) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 9/14/22; Judge Claria Horn Boom recused. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers for all further proceedingscc: Counsel, CM-GNS (DJT) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 9/12/2022. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings RECUSES from this matter and the action is reassigned to the docket of District Judge Claria Horn Boom for all further proceedings. Counsel are requested to change the Civil action number to reflect the initials CHB on all further pleadings. cc: Counsel, CHB-CM (SMJ) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Meade Circuit Court and Counsel/Parties re: DN #1 Notice of Removal. (CDL) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (CDL) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock Inc. for The Andersons, Inc. (CDL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (No Answer Filed) by The Andersons, Inc. from Meade Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00183, (Filing fee $402; Receipt No. AKYWDC-3653145), filed by The Andersons, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Demand, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E - State Court Filings, #6 Cover Sheet) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sipes v. The Andersons, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fred Sipes | |
Represented By: | Michael W. McCain, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Andersons, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Donald J. Kelly |
Represented By: | Jacob D. Bylund |
Represented By: | Jordan M. White |
Represented By: | Machen Picard Bihrle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.