Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc. |
Verizon Wireless Services, LLC |
3:2022cv00493 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 11/16/2022 granting #8 Motion for Kelley Barnaby to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #9 Motion for Robert H. Poole II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel(NWT) |
Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, MOTION for Attorney Fees by Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #2 Exhibit A - Letter Regarding Claims, #3 Proposed Order Dismissing Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, #4 Proposed Order Granting Attorneys' Fees) (Kingsley, Meredith). Added MOTION for Attorney Fees on 11/15/2022 (DLW). |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Communications, Inc. for Verizon Wireless Services, LLC by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Affiliates: Cellco Partnership; Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC; MCI Communications Services LLC; GTE Wireless LLC; Verizon Americas LLC; Verizon Wireless) (Kingsley, Meredith) Modified on 11/15/2022 to add affiliates (DLW). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Robert H. Poole II to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $125, receipt number AKYWDC-3696000) by Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Continued List of Court Admissions, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing) (Kingsley, Meredith) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2022: #3 Proposed Order) (DLW). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Kelley Barnaby to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $125, receipt number BKYWDC-3695993) by Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - List of Court Admissions, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing) (Kingsley, Meredith) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2022: #3 Proposed Order) (DLW). |
Filing 7 AGREED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 10/11/2022 granting #6 Proposed Agreed Order. Verizon's response to the Complaint is due on Monday, 11/11/2022. cc: Counsel (DLW) |
Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff and Defendant by Plaintiff Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc. (O'Donnell, Harry) Modified on 10/11/2022 to change event from Agreed Motion to Agreed Order (DLW). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC served on 9/23/2022, answer due 10/14/2022. (O'Donnell, Harry) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc. (O'Donnell, Harry) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Verizon Wireless Services, LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3661570, filed by Midwest Cabinet Suppliers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.