Mathers v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Brian David Mathers |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv00538 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case reassigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom for all further proceedings pursuant to General Order 2019-11.cc:counsel (TLB) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 12/1/2022. (SRH) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (JWM) |
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 10/25/2022 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney as outlined in General Order 21-20. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 10/25/2022 granting #4 Motion for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3678536. by Plaintiff Brian David Mathers (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Good Standing) (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brian David Mathers. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (CDL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Brian David Mathers. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered -Atty General, #3 Summons Tendered - SSA, #4 Summons Tendered - US Atty) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mathers v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian David Mathers | |
| Represented By: | David F. Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
