Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Davida Walker |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv00539 |
| October 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Regina S Edwards |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security by Commissioner of Social Security. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
|
|
Filing 8
Case reassigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton pursuant to General Order 2019-11.cc: Counsel (AEH)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards on 10/21/2022 granting #6 Motion for Bryan Konoski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SRH)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Bryan Konoski to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3681048. by Plaintiff Davida Walker (Konoski, Bryan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/21/2022: #1 Proposed Order) (SRH).
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Bryan M. Konoski re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/31/2022. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 11/1/2022. (SRH)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (SRH)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. (SRH)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Davida Walker against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3674350. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons tendered) (SRH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Davida Walker | |
| Represented By: | Bryan M. Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Laura Ridgell-Boltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
