King v. Scarborough et al
Steven Michael King |
J. J. Scarborough, John (last name unknown) and Larry Sizemore |
3:2022cv00589 |
November 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Letter from Plaintiff Steven Michael King. (DLW) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Steven Michael King. (DLW) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 11/15/2022: Plaintiff shall within 30 days of entry of this Order file an amended complaint on the Court's approved 1983 complaint form. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a 1983 complaint form with this case number and the word "Amended" affixed to the caption. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (w/amended 1983 form) (DLW) |
Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re: DN #1 Complaint - No summons tendered. (CDL) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (CDL) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Michael King. (CDL) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Steven Michael King. (CDL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John (last name unknown), J. J. Scarborough, and Larry Sizemore, (No Filing Fee Paid), filed by Steven Michael King. (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.