Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kenneth Burton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2022cv00672 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security. Social Security Submission due by 5/1/2023. by Commissioner of Social Security. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 1/31/2023. (SRH)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (SRH)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 1/6/2023 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to file Burton's Complaint and is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by following the process outlined in General Order No. 21-20. cc: Counsel (SRH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 1/6/2023 granting #4 Motion for BRYAN KONOSKI to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SRH)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for BRYAN KONOSKI to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3718479. by Plaintiff Kenneth Burton (Konoski, Bryan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2022: #1 Proposed Order) (SRH).
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kenneth Burton. (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Proposed Order) (DeW)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. (DeW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kenneth Burton. (Attachments: #1 Summons TENDERED, #2 Cover Sheet) (DeW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Burton | |
| Represented By: | Bryan M. Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Laura Ridgell-Boltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
