Rashad v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
| Muhammad Rashad |
| Ryder System, Inc., Visionary Sleep, LLC and Gustafson's Furniture |
| 3:2023cv00092 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 3/16/2023 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days of the entry date of this Order, Plaintiff must file a copy of his EEOC right-to-sue letter. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (DLW)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF TENDERED SUMMONSES by Muhammad Rashad re #4 Notice on Summons (Attachments: #1 Notice on Summons, #2 Envelope) (DLW) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint - summons completed incorrectly. (CDL) |
| Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Muhammad Rashad. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (CDL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gustafson's Furniture, Ryder System, Inc., Visionary Sleep, LLC, (No filing fee paid), filed by Muhammad Rashad. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (CDL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
